Indonesia
Conflict has been an integral part of human history, oftentime as a catalyst for transformation, yet equally a threat to social stability. Ho-Won Jeong (2000) defines conflict as a condition in which two or more groups contend over values, power and resources, seeking to neutralize or eliminate their opponents. In modern life, understanding the various forms of conflict and the approaches to addressing them has become increasingly critical to fostering global harmony.
Samuel Folarin (2015) categorizes conflict into four types: revolt, insurgency, mutiny and protest. Revolt refers to popular uprisings against an established order, often serving as the precursor to major revolutions. Insurgency denotes organized rebellion against the state, as witnessed in the conflict in South Sudan. Mutiny centers on military defiance, while protest encompasses demonstrations that are frequently peaceful but may escalate into violence.
History demonstrates that conflict does not emerge randomly. Cordula Reimann (2004) outlines two principal analytical approaches: the subjectivist and the objectivist. The subjectivist lens highlights incompatible goals rooted in cultural misunderstanding or stereotyping. The objectivist approach, by contrast, attributes conflict to structural injustices such as class inequality.
Read also: Tolerance: A False Mask of Peace or the True Path to Social Harmony?
In the religious sphere, M. Y. Wibisono (2021) notes that religion often becomes a flashpoint when drawn into political contestation. Such tensions create conditions in which religion dominates politics or vice versa, producing absolutist systems that constrain social creativity. Saudi Arabia, for instance, despite its vast resources, has experienced cultural stagnation linked to the dominance of religion in public life.
Yet history also records periods when the separation of religion and politics fostered intellectual flourishing. Under the Abbasid Caliphate, relative freedom of thought generated monumental achievements in art and science. Similarly, during the Mughal Empire, intellectual progress accelerated amid tolerance for diverse ideas.
The separation of religion from politics is often advanced as an ideal solution to mitigate conflict. Religion, free from political instrumentalization, derives its strength from conviction rather than state patronage. When compelled to conform to rapid social and scientific change under political pressure, the risk of conflict intensifies due to institutional rigidity.
I. N. Sudira (2017) reinforces this view by emphasizing the complexity of conflict in both domestic and international relations. In an era of global transformation, managing and resolving conflict poses formidable challenges. Conflict resolution must therefore move beyond short-term settlement toward the creation of systems capable of accommodating diversity.
Within peace studies, conflict resolution has evolved into a distinct academic discipline dedicated to innovative strategies for addressing disputes. As P. K. Putri (2022) explains, conflict management and conflict resolution perform complementary functions. Management establishes initial conditions for peace, while resolution refines and institutionalizes sustainable reconciliation.
Nonviolent approaches have gained increasing relevance. Preventing conflict before escalation enables more realistic and implementable strategies. Timing, credible commitment and the engagement of third parties are critical determinants of success.
In the Indonesian context, religion occupies a unique position. A. Saifuddin (2019) observes that the socio-anthropological understanding of religion differs from its administrative-political definition in Indonesia. State recognition of six official religions has generated distinct social dynamics, at times contributing to tension.
Nevertheless, conflict does not invariably produce destruction. In many instances, it serves as a catalyst for social reform and innovation. Societies that manage conflict constructively often generate more advanced and inclusive civilizations.
Social revolutions, for example, frequently arise from organized dissatisfaction. Peaceful protests can initiate transformative change when guided by effective strategy. Conversely, poorly coordinated rebellions often culminate in widespread loss.
In this respect, conflict resolution extends beyond ending hostilities; it involves rebuilding trust among adversaries. Inclusive dialogue and a nuanced understanding of root causes are indispensable components of this process.
Read also: Islamic Education PhD Graduates 100th and 101st Doctorates
Globally, interstate conflicts are frequently driven by competition over resources. These tensions are exacerbated by economic inequality and power asymmetry, creating entrenched cycles of confrontation.
Yet globalization also offers grounds for optimism. As technological connectivity deepens, opportunities for cross-cultural dialogue expand. Innovative approaches in conflict resolution can transform entrenched antagonisms into openings for peace.
Although formidable challenges persist, advances in conflict resolution studies provide a measure of hope for a more harmonious future. By integrating academic insight with practical engagement, the global community can cultivate coexistence within diversity.
Ultimately, conflict is inseparable from the human condition. With informed understanding and strategic intervention, however, it can be redirected toward building a more just and peaceful world.
Author: Imam Alfafan Yakub
References:
Folarin, S.F. (2015). Types and Causes of Conflict (Readings in Peace and Conflict Studies). Covenant University. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/32224 691.pdf
Jeong, H-W. (2000). Peace and Conflict Studies: An Introduction (1st ed). Routledge.
Putri, P. K. (2022). Manajemen konflik dan resolusi Konflik: sebuah pendekatan terhadap perdamaian. Papua Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, 2(1), 16-34.
Reimann, C. (2004). Assessing the state-ofthe-art in conflict transformation. In A. Austin., M. Fischer., & N. Ropers. Transforming Ethnopolitical Conflict (pp. 41–66). Springer
Saifuddin, A. (2019). Psikologi Agama: Implementasi Psikologi untuk Memahami Perilaku Agama. Kencana.
Sudira, I. N. (2017). Resolusi konflik dalam perubahan dunia. Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional, 19(2), 156-171.
Wibisono, M. Y. (2021). Agama dan Resolusi Konflik.
